Gender and Sex: Who said Men can Become Women?

How can societal attitudes be fundamentally transformed? In the 1950s, almost everyone thought abortion represented a moral evil, even those who had one. However, over time, attitudes changed. What precipitated this shift and what were the driving forces behind it?

We are dominated by a relatively small number of persons who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind
– Edward Bernays, The Father of Public Relation

In 1995, Princes Diana informed the world the reason her marriage to Prince Charles failed was because “there were three of us in this marriage.” Camilla was subsequently vilified in the press as ‘the other woman,’ who shattered Diana’s fairy tale marriage and the British declared they would never accept her as Queen.

In an effort to rehabilitate Camilla’s public image and secure her position as a future Queen, Prince Charles enlisted the services of a public relations firm. Their campaign was dedicated to reshaping public perceptions surrounding his relationship with Camilla. It was a carefully crafted game of perception, which the BBC reported on, noting how Camilla was rebranded. This strategised campaign highlights the efficacy of perception manipulation, a technique employed by advertisers to shift attitudes, behaviours, and patterns.

One believes things because one has been conditioned to believe them
– Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

In psychology, we learn that branding manipulation tactics are employed by marketers to sell to those who don’t want to buy. It’s the same with societal changes. Abortion was branded a moral evil in our history because it destroys an innocent human life, but that brand was changed to, ‘My body, my choice.’ The science didn’t change; it’s still two bodies – the stronger body and the weaker body which is dependent on the generosity of the stronger for life.

The victim of mind-manipulation does not know that he is a victim
– Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

Just a few years ago, everyone accepted there are only two sexes, male and female. But those who engineer the direction of society decided to change the meaning of gender, calling it a construct.

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in a democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country
– Edward Bernays

Today, when we hear young people promoting ‘gender identity,’ on social media, they don’t appreciate that everything they are maintaining is not a product of their thoughts. They are repeating things heard in lectures, as the elite manipulate them. This creates a feedback loop which floods social media, especially TikTok. Those desperate to be accepted and avoid social shaming, repeat the lies they hear until it becomes their truth.

The only difference between ‘propaganda’ and ‘education,’ really, is in the point of view
– Edward Bernays

Hitler’s misinformation and propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels said, “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth.” He became a master of a manipulation phenomenon identified as the “Illusion of Truth.” As the brain utilises repetition as a shortcut to judge reality, if false information is repeated by authority figures over and over again, people will begin to believe the lie is truth.

Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it and eventually they will believe it
– Joseph Goebbels

The 1950s Asch Conformity Experiments combined with the study of the psychology of Contagion, also provide evidence that individuals will yield to something they believe to be false, if the majority of the group supports the lie and the misinformation will spread like wildfire. This is why adult women will campaign for a man (who calls himself a woman) to shower with his male genitals exposed, in female only safe spaces. It’s the same for a giant of a man (now called a woman) who crushes a female-only sporting record. The fear of being called a bigot and being rejected by society overrides the reality that a man is in the woman’s shower.

We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of
– Edward Bernays

The notion that gender is a binary system comprising of male and female was universally accepted only a few years ago. However, this view has lately been challenged by the elite in a concerted effort to redefine gender. Social engineering has been employed to propagate the notion of ‘gender identity’ which has gained widespread traction, particularly among young people on platforms like TikTok. It is known that repetition and endorsement by authority figures can make even the most fallacious statements appear plausible and true.

The idea that people can change their gender became popularised by Dr John Money, a deeply disturbing sexologist and psychologist who coined the terms ‘gender identity’ and ‘gender role.’ His claims constitute the foundation for the ‘gender fluidity’ movement.

The work of Dr John Money, the father of modern ‘gender identity’ theory was instrumental in solidifying the concept of gender in the mind of the elite. However, Dr Money’s legacy is shrouded in controversy since his research involved sexual experiments on children that bordered on paedophilia.

Jesus said, “But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were thrown into the sea”
– Mark 9:42

Dr Money’s attitude to children and sex was alarming. In a 1991 interview for the journal, he said, “If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who’s intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual, then I would not call it pathological in any way.”

That was a doctor – the founder of the ‘gender identity movement,’ describing how it could be acceptable for a man in his thirties to abuse a ten-year-old child in a sexual relationship.

Children who were brought to Dr Money for help were subjected to ominous sexual experiments. Teaching parents that gender identity is primarily learned, Dr Money intervened in the case of a twin called David Reimer. Money was given the perfect opportunity to teach the world that gender is a construct. After a genital mutilation accident, David was raised as a girl and his brother as a boy. This was dubbed the John/Joan case. Both children were subjected to sexual rehearsal play and the children begged their parents to never visit Dr Money again. Both committed suicide in their adult lives, after years of torment.

Money was never kept accountable for his sexual experiments on children, in the name of ‘science.’ The world’s first gender identity clinic was then established by Dr Money, at John Hopkins in 1965 and his work constitutes the foundation for all ‘gender identity science.’ Dr Money’s view concerning the ‘malleability of gender’ has become the dominant viewpoint and is having the same impact on the mental health of young people today, as it did when Money experimented on children decades ago.

The results of Money’s research were published around the world, taught, encouraged and shared as scientific facts. An entire generation was manipulated to believe that the thoughts of an apologist for paedophilia represent justice. These young people are quoting feelings as facts, and repeating thoughts and words that are not their own, promoting gender experiments as good and right. The elite is deceptively marketing the story that ‘gender identity’ is fluid, creating a confused generation.

But from the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female
– Mark 10:6

The transformation of societal attitudes concerning gender identity represents a complex process that relies on people not having an anchor of faith in their life. While public relations and perception manipulation can alter opinions, the trend of redefining gender is another example of public relations triumphing over a beautiful understanding of humans as God’s creation.

When Christianity constituted the foundation of society, young people were taught to make peace with their bodies, as a gift from God. Today, they are coerced into mutilating their bodies and increasing numbers regret this path, as they detransition to their God-given sex and gender. In turn, they are launching lawsuits and investigations into the ‘new science’ that secures its foundations in the old paedophilia. The sexualisation of confused and struggling children will always be sinful.