The Politically Correct Christmas
In Britain, there is a growing trend attempting to remove any trace of Christ from Christianity,
especially during the Christmas season. The influence of political correctness is growing and it
is fast becoming the scrooge of Christmas.
Several years
ago Birmingham Council renamed the Christmas holidays, Winterval. Job Centres and the Red Cross banned
Christmas trees and decorations in an attempt not to offend non-Christians. In 2003, a library in High Wycombe,
Buckinghamshire, banned posters for a church carol service because of fears that non-Christians would be offended.
|
|
|
The PC brigade state that they do not want to offend those of other faiths by using the phrase “Christmas”
or more specifically the name "Christ", yet they care nothing for Christians and completely disregard 2,000
years of Christian history and they ingnore the few billion people across the world who celebrate the birth
of Jesus Christ.
On the 9th December 2004, a British national paper had the caption: ‘The Most Offensive Picture in Britain’
with the picture of the nativity on its front cover! The newspaper dedicated two full pages to the follies
of companies and organisations that banned Christmas tinsel, Christmas calendars, Christmas parties,
Christmas cards etc. from their premises, lest they offend those of other faiths. Those who were of other
faiths were asked whether they were offended by Christmas celebrations and none of those asked were;
in actual fact they thought it was foolishness.
The following year a law firm commissioned a survey; they asked two thousand bosses whether their
firms would be allowing Christmas decorations to be displayed in their offices. Two thirds said that
they would not allow Christmas trees or decorations to be displayed on their premises.
Some bosses stated that under the equal rights terms, they would have to hang decorations
celebrating all other religions’ special occasions. For others it was probably a good excuse
not to spend extra money.
On the 20th October 2004, a British national newspaper had the caption ‘Christmas Banned in Religious Education’
on its front page – as a fifty-five minute teaching video entitled ‘A Child Eye View of Festivals’ promoting
religious festivals had ignored Christmas and Easter! Christian Church leaders alongside
education experts condemned the British video which hundreds of schools had already ordered. The video extols
the teaching on the Jewish festival of Hanukkah, the Chinese New Year, the Hindu festival of Divali and the
Muslim festival of Eid-ul-Fitr. The video is aimed at three to six year olds to promote religious tolerance
and to help children understand different cultures, yet ten’s of thousands of children will not be told about
the significance of Christmas or Easter which all evolves around the birth, life and death of Jesus Christ – the
‘founder’ of Christianity which is the cornerstone of the Western world, and these celebrations are two of
the main festivals in the religious calendar, and not just the Christian calendar. There are 12 million
children in the UK, but only 756,000 regularly attend church.
In December 2005 the Breakout Trust, a Christian charity sent every primary school in the UK (25,199)
an animated cartoon film, ‘It’s a Boy!’ telling the story of Jesus' birth through the eyes of quails. It
was created after a boy asked the question, “Why did Mary and Joseph name their baby after a swear word?”
The films aim is to ensure a basic level of teaching in schools.
On the 1st November 2005, a British national newspaper highlighted south London’s Lambeth’s Council
political-correctness, who insisted on renaming the Christmas display as ‘Winter Lights’ so as
not to offend those of other faiths.
In three districts they were called Winter Lights on posters and flyers to publicise the switching-on ceremonies,
while in the fourth, they were called Celebrity Lights. Local residents of all faiths were left bemused by the
gesture – saying that Christmas could never offend them.
One national newspaper began to run a campaign, ‘Christmas Killjoys’ a few days later, Lambeth Council climbed down in the face of public condemnation
and restored the word Christmas.
|
In November 2005, the Inland Revenue banned
its staff from donating to send-a-toy charity, Samaritan Purse, because of its Christian links.
The Revenue’s 100,000 employees have supported Operation Christmas Child since the late 1990’s, but
are no longer allowed to support such a worthy cause during working hours. The appeal sends more than
a million shoes boxes, full of donated items such as soap, gloves, toys, sweets etc. from Britain
to children situated in the poorer countries of the world.
The Church of England condemned the ban.
|
|
|
Town Bans Christmas Lights
On the 16th November 2005, a British national newspaper caption was ‘Now a town bans Santa and the Christmas Lights.’
Havant Borough Council, Hampshire decided to remove the word Christmas from the turning-on ceremony and renamed
it the Festival of Light, so as not to offend those of other faiths, yet this is a Hindu festival, the feast
of Dewali!
Santa's grotto, in the Meridian Shopping Centre for the past ten years has been organised by the Havant Lions
charity which has raised thousands of pounds for local good causes, but now has been shut down as it posed
a fire risk. One of the local shop keepers said, “Banning Santa’s Grotto and dropping the word Christmas is
ludicrous. It will make for a miserable Christmas in Havant.”
One reporter wrote, ‘Our local government numpties have struck again. Havant Borough Council…banned
references to Christmas because of an utterly groundless fear of offending minorities. Perhaps this
council should adopt a new motto: “I’m sorry, I Havant a clue.” ’
Threatened with a Lawsuit
At the end of November 2005, the city of Boston, America, had to change their stance on the label
of the annual “Christmas” tree, after being threatened with a lawsuit by the Liberty Counsel
because they referred to the fir as a “holiday” tree. Liberty Counsel President Matthew Staver said,
“Calling a Christmas tree a holiday tree isn’t being inclusive. It’s disenfranchising people of faith.
It’s like calling a menorah a candle stick.”
The next day an American chain store, backtracked on the labelling of its “Holidays” Trees.
They removed the offensive banners from its stores which are now correctly labelled as “Christmas” trees.
The chain store stated that the language on the banner was a mistake, and was not in any way an attempt to
remove Christmas from the season.
|
|
|
Xmas or Christmas
For some Christians, they get very offended if they receive a Xmas card instead of a Christmas card
believing that Christ has been left out of Christmas, but in actual fact the term ‘Xmas’ is a Christian
shortened form of the word ‘Christmas.’
The letter X is the Greek letter ‘chi’ and has been used as a symbol for the name of Christ (Christos)
since the first century. The word ‘Xmas’ dates back to the twelfth century when it was used in the
‘Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.’
Though in the day and age that we live in, where PC abounds, it is not recommended to abbreviate
Christmas to Xmas, and may we all continue to let the world know that Jesus Christ is the reason
for the season and without Christ there would be no Christmas - or redemption.
Let us not forget that Jesus came
into the world as a baby, but He will come back as a Warrior, and on the Day of Judgment we will
all stand before Him to give an account. There is only one way to heaven and that is through faith in the Lord
Jesus Christ, as we repent of our sins and turn to Him, because whoever calls upon the name of the Lord will be saved.
|
|
|
|
|